I find it ironic that the naysayers are 'new' members.

And that they're privy to the thought processes of certain segments of the populous. With that sort of talent, they should be helping society get its act together instead of bullshitting on a porn site, yeah?

 

I don't think I have seen ANYONE in this thread in favor or child rape, molestation or abuse. Certainly not child sex trade/forced prostitution or snuff! You are jumping from point A to point Z and ignoring the other 24 points along the way. Yes the things you mention do go on in the world but that is NOT the normal or even remote outcome of a curious child having experimental sexual interaction with an adult. The things you mention are the extremely rare outcome. Most kids get curious. They play around with other kids. Some may do things with family friends or relatives. But in most cases it is not forced on them and the adult has no intention of any sort to harm or "abuse" this child. Don't get me wrong I am in no way in favor of adults seeking out children for sex or trying to trick or talk them into things but on those occassions when it is the child who is curious and experimental let them satisfy their curiosity. (It's going to happen no matter how many of you want to believe kids don't do these things willingly). They see what's what and move on. Or whatever.

 

And if this is such big business show the writers the money trail... because I'm sure they would really like a piece of the dirty filthy money. Because as a writer on this site I haven't seen a red cent, much less a nickel of financial support for my beer habit, which supports my writing habit. We don't do pictures here... and most of us don't do real stories here...

 

great. not to be combative here. seems most people ''ask'' for proof. are these people that have so little belief in themselves they can't do for themselves? get your own proof. stop asking the world for a handout. in a sane mind where is proof needed anyway? if there is even an OUTSIDE CHANCE of 6 billion to 1 that even 1 child might be harmed by the promotion of child crimes, no matter how innocent, why would ANYONE risk it? you get your proof there is no proof. do the legwork. if you prove to YOURSELF there's nothing there then you'll be right. but you'll find shit you wish you never found. guaranteed.

 

Um, like, duh?

The people here are either writing fictional stories, which is legal, or they are reading fictional stories, which is also legal. Sure, the site owners and moderators restrict the content, but that is a business policy that they choose to enforce, for the sake of their advertisers.

People who want to write or read legal, fictional stories between adults and toddlers can go to legal places like a*s*s*t*r*n*e*p***, which happens to have no such business policy, and which also happens to be legally hosted in North America.

As for you, "Scored," you twisted little piece of shit, you've done a lot of bragging about all the sick stuff you've found, as a "concerned citizen" (right), purely for the sake of educating yourself (right) about how evil everyone else is (right). Where do you go for the trash you've found, and how? Because if you've found even half of what you say you've found, then it took a hell of a lot of effort, with one hand on your keyboard and another between your legs, you sick fuck. Right?

For your sake, not that anyone here cares, I hope you found your little dragon hoard on TOR PROJECT (TOR=child porn). In that case, Law Enforcement might take six months or so to find you, because they're currently letting all the shitheads of the world gather at TOR and commiserate under the mistaken impression that they're safe there.

But if you found all your child porn trash on HTTP, you should expect a nice tight pair of steel handcuffs anytime, because you've broken a few dozen laws just to "educate yourself" with all your self-righteous crap.

I hope the orgasms were worth it.

Dweeb.

 

No, of course not.you just want to be informative, I'm sure.

Hand out? When did giving a reasonable explanation of ones position become charity?
I'm sorry to inform you that the burden of proof lays at the door of he who made the assertion, you in this case.
Besides it is unreasonable to demand proof that this is NOT happening, logically, what would constitute proof of this negative?

A sane mind? From what you've written I find it hard to believe the you know what a sane even is, but be that as it may.
No thank you, I don't think I'm going looking for that crap, but the FBI, INTERPOL, and other such agencies, if they don't keep the kind of statistics you need, they are likely to be able to point you in the right direction.
Law enforcement can be refreshingly cooperative when you're doing genuine research.

6 billion to 1?
I like those odds.
I'm pretty sure that the odds on the Earth being struck by a planet killing meteor/comet are better.
Now couple that with the fact, a fact established in my mind through what people have told me in PMs e-mails, etc. that my so-called "*SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM* stories" if they can so be called, have been responsible for a lot of good orgasms.
Known orgasms versus vague chance (6 billion to 1), yeeeeaahh, I think I'll keep writing.:excited:

 

The FBI sucks then, because i've seen a few. It's strange, but every time evokes a deep rage. Other people get horrified, some actually seem to find joy in it, I just get really pissed off.

Execution videos are rough, especially if you've ever been in situations where it could be YOU on that video.

Self-mutilation videos are also really really fucked up. The underbelly of the world goes all the way down. It's bottomless.

 

A sane mind does require proof. For the choleric psychopath, Proof is his weapon against all other lesser minds, and a controll for his power base.(even if his proof is imaginary)

For the sanguine narcissist, proof is the rock through his dream world that sends him into that narcissistic rage. (kill the witnesses to my pathetic existence!)

Proof is required for a sane mind, as the choleric the Id absorbs the Ego. He is a man who will stand for Truth, and Justice! He will have a Final Solution to these ills of society, he is the vission of social change! And he has numbers to back him, whoa boy!

For the Sanguine, the Ego absorbs the Id. You have the pleasure seeking lizard brain of the Ego. The Ego goin' "stroke me baby, stroke me baby!" Stab a motherfucker in the back to get some more money for coke and bitches ? Hell yeah, sell out my company for a half billion dollars!

Neither of these guys have real proof. One's proof is fabricated, while the other's proof is denied.

 

I've seen some things that purported to be snuff, but they always have tells that let you know they were faked.
I've yet to see a person killed in good lighting for one thing, and I'm not saying I want to, but I've never really seen any that were in very good focus either.
Like any movie the reality of it rests on how much you buy into it.
Now I could be wrong, maybe you've seen some up close, in focus, grisly ass shit of people getting their heads cut off, and shit, but if what you've seen is anything like what I've seen, I'd say take a closer look.

 

I'll respond to the bullshit in more detail later when I've finished doing important stuff.

However, I just must respond to the conniption fits that the pedos are having here because somebody dares to call them out onto the carpet for their sick desires. It's clear by their reactions that deep down in their putrid hearts they know that they're sick fucks for being sexually attracted to little kids. But they fight that truth and attack those who shine the light of truth on them. If you throw a rock into a pack of dogs the dog that gets hit will yelp....

Yeah. I'm a newbie.

What I'm privy to is that the *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM* stories are a form of porn. Look up the definition of porn...and it will not take much effort to come to the logical conclusion that readers are getting boners and beating off to it. By definition getting boners and beating off to little kids---real or imagined---is a pretty good sign that one is a *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM*.

 

This thread has my support.

 

Seen most of the soldier beheadings out of the middle east. Made myself watch those. Seen some shootings, knifings, and this one russian(i think) snuff film involving a hammer. Those guys actually got caught and are in prison right now.

I suppose if you're connecting snuff films with sex... I have not seen a sexual snuff film. I just don't actively seek death anymore. Not afraid of it, I just don't need to see people dying. I got no pleasure from sadism whatsoever (not talking rough sex, but true sadism)

 

anything illegal should be banned

i agrre with the banning of *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM* stories, but surely also incest as well. why people feel the need to come on here and say things like theyve been fucking their sister etc, gross and people should grow up and get their heads tested.

 

Why do you care ? Really ? Somone has some really messed up childhood, or a strange outlook on life... why do you care ? Are they hurting you ?

 

idiot

so because i find *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM* and incest stories sick, i must of had a bad childhood lol. you moron. obviously the idiots defending these stories need the help not me. it's illegal for a reason you muppet. but then again i see where your from so whats offensive for me is the norm for you.

 

I am so glad that my ancestors emigrated to America, with the way you write the mother tongue I'd be embarrassed to admit you were a countrymen of mine.
Your reading comprehension doesn't seem to be much better.
I'm pretty sure that when Sanguine Narcissist mentioned, "Somone has some really messed up childhood, or a strange outlook on life..." he was referring to people that read, and write these stories, and the "...Why do you care?" bit, that was addressed to you.

It's not against the law to write any fictional story you want in America, that's one of the reasons we rebelled, we don't need the crown to tell us what we can, and cannot say.

 

I agree !!!

I hope that something gets done about it soon!!

 

You titled this anything illegal should be banned.

That would leave nearly no stories at all, for people to read. There people cheating on their spouses which is illegal to most since it breaks a commandment. There is people fucking dead people which is illegal. That one grosses me out but people write about it, and I am not going to tell them not too. There is people fucking animals which is illegal. There is also stories of people killing people.... wait let me check.... yep that's illegal too. Let's not forget about rape stories now.

I may not agree or like any of these, but its not illegal to write about it, if it were there wouldn't be any t.v shows or movies. If you don't like it that's fine but people really shouldn't push your beliefs on other people

 

I don't have half as many posts in this thread as you and others do. In fact, this is my second post out of your seven

Conniption fit, indeed. Did you look in the mirror while you made that statement?

Being attracted to women that look like kids isn't exactly a platform with which to rally against anyone. Get off your high horse, Joey. The light of truth would have to come from someone that's pure of heart and you're nowhere near saintly.

I see that you are the voice of the naysayers. What say all of you?

And by definition, getting a boner and beating off when you look at a feminized male in woman's clothing, and wanting to suck his cock - real or imagined - makes you a homosexual.

If you wrote a book about killing your entire family, slitting their throats with a butcher knife and swimming through a bathtub full of their blood, I'm sure you'll be hauled in for a lengthy stay at your local prison. You're a murderer.

 

No no no no no. It doesn't work like that. You're the one advocating for limitations on behavior. The very nature of your position demands proof that such a limitation does more good than harm.

And before you try to turn it back on me again, note that I am actually arguing a neutral position: I'm opposed to all artificial restraints in this context, regardless of the nature of those restraints. A lack of artificial restraints is the neutral starting point. This point needs no justification because it occurs naturally if there is no intervention. It is the deviation from this state in any direction that must be justified.

So when I ask for proof, I'm not asking for myself. I'm just pointing out what I thought was obvious to everyone.

Nice argument, but utterly disingenuous (I love that word!). Let's apply your same argument to other things.

If there is even an OUTSIDE CHANCE of someone being harmed by a car, shouldn't we outlaw cars?

If there is even an OUTSIDE CHANCE of someone having an allergic reaction to a bee sting, shouldn't we exterminate honeybees?

If there is even an OUTSIDE CHANCE of someone being harmed by a person, shouldn't we eradicate all people?

The "Outside Chance" argument is, quite frankly, tiring. If you want to ban something, you need to demonstrate that the ban will do more good than harm.

Let me put it another way.

If there is even an OUTSIDE CHANCE that a pedophile will get his rocks off reading stories instead of raping little girls, shoudn't we allow *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM* stories?